The Bathers by Paul Cézanne (1906)

A beautiful & complex painting at London’s National Gallery.

Firstly, I love the subject matter - recalling the charm of summer afternoons, friendships, swimming, lounging. The viewer isn’t directly engaged by the painting. We are intruding, almost. (I have already written about this painting in my write-up of the “After Impressionism” exhibition).

Then, there is a wonderful sense of harmony, a “balance”, to the painting - against the obvious verisimilitude. The colours of the ground and skin, the blues of the sky and shade. I like how the ladies resemble plants and flower petals. 

The difference between Cézanne and his fellow Impressionists is that, while they were looking at the immediate effect of light, he was looking at how he/we perceived objects. Every brushstroke is clearly deliberate and economic - clearly the result of some deep thought.

To paint a harmonious picture, he needed to paint the ladies in a way that relates “naturally” to their environment. And for Cezanne, they appear solid while obeying the proper rules of light (the impressionist inheritance) and a broader harmony. 

Cézanne wasn’t interested in imitating the real world. He wanted to reassemble the elements of the three-dimensional world on a flat canvas. In other words, to represent the real spatial relationships between objects without breaking up the flatness of the canvas. Rather like bringing a sheet of paper to a window pane and tracing what you see outside. The cubists took this idea and sought different perspectives.

He challenges the Renaissance perspective about how we have come to understand that third-dimension; and does so in compelling and beautiful way.

Spring Sunshine in the Meadow at Eragny by Camille Pissarro (1887)

This painting is exquisite. 

It has a daydream-like quality and filled with the beauty and peacefulness of the countryside.

It is by the impressionist painter Camille Pissarro. I saw it in D’Orsay. 

It was painted later in his life when he settled in the village north of Paris, Eragny.

Pissarro’s brushstrokes are magical. His technique of “broken colour” entails small strokes of different blotches side-by-side as opposed to being mixed on the palette. It’s clearly influenced by Seurat’s pointillism (whom he met in 1885). The sense of warmth is captured in the yellows and oranges bouncing of the surfaces (especially the green grassland). Even the bluey shadows seem to further the shimmering sunshine as a wonderful contrast.

The solitary charming lady - holding her basket - almost melts into the atmosphere of sunshine. She is beautiful because she is connected to the nature itself. She is warmth and peace too.

I think the evocation of sunshine and spring make for a moving uplifting painting.

Hamas chose this war and they could easily end it

Israel has resumed the Gaza strikes targeting mid-level Hamas commanders. Ceasefire over.

This war could be stopped tomorrow if Hamas releases the hostages.

They have refused to do so.

✲✲✲

Hamas have also refused to step down from control over Gaza. As such, the ceasefire simply could not proceed to phase 2. I have argued before that this was the likeliest of contingencies.  Israel supported the extension of phase 1 with the release of hostages, but Hamas refused that as well. 

So what other sensible option are there for Israel?

Every single aspect of this so-called ceasefire has been an insult and a joke.

Permitting Hamas to hold onto the hostages indefinitely (i.e. until “Israel fully withdraws from Gaza and agrees to permanently end the war”) was never any form of guarantee for the safety of the hostages. It was a humiliating arrangement which ceded de facto authority to Hamas with no guarantee for their return in any timely manner. Moreover, Hamas were never going to release their only leverage - the hostages.

And what has happened during the 2-month ceasefire? It seems hundreds of new targets were identified by Israeli military and 20,000 terrorists from Hamas and Islamic Jihad took up positions in Gaza preparing to continue attacks. This is a holy war against Israel. The updated 2017 Charter of Hamas makes clear their intent to never end their war against Israel. The original Hamas Charter of 1988 set out their absolute goal of destroying Israel.

Meanwhile, it is Israel that is expected to completely disarm and withdraw. What a joke! Israel is expected to permit Hamas resume their strategic positions, release hundreds of Jew-murderers while Hamas begin their reconstruction, as if nothing ever happened. The same Hamas which has vowed their destruction. The 24 living Israeli hostages will probably still be held - even after the reconstruction of Gaza is complete.

Israel cannot stop while Hamas is left in power. Hamas will never give up their weapons and leave. There’s no choice here. 

Israel must fight on.

“Michelangelo, Leonardo, Raphael: Florence c. 1504” exhibition at the Royal Academy

I’ve recently visited this fabulous exhibition at the Royal Academy in London. I left the gallery elated.

The Royal Academy have pit together works by Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo and Raphael and focused on the year 1504 – when all three of them briefly crossed paths in Florence and competed for patronage from wealthy patrons. The exhibition focuses on three of the greatest Renaissance works in Britain - The Taddei Tondo, The Bridgewater Madonna and The Burlington House cartoon.

I loved it and was beside myself with excitement in the world of these Renaissance greats. I especially love shows which focus on art history in some depth (such as the possible reason for the Burlington House cartoon).

Overall score: ★★★★★ 5/5

✲✲✲

Gallery 1 - “Michelangelo, Raphael and The Taddei Tondo”

The exhibition is split into three rooms and the first room focuses very much on the Royal Academy’s Michelangelo masterpiece The Taddei Tondo.

This tondo (meaning “round”) is the only significant marble work by Michelangelo in any permanent UK collection and it’s beautifully displayed.

The Virgin and Child with Infant St John the Baptist (The Taddei Tondo) by Michelangelo (1504–1505)

In this marble, the infant St John presents the baby Christ with a goldfinch (the symbol of his Passion). The baby turns away from the bird in fear. As I said, it’s the only marble sculpture by Michelangelo in Britain and despite being unfinished, it is widely regarded as one of his most important works.

Michelangelo never completed the relief, which shows different degrees of finish – e.g., the goldfinch is hardly recognisable.

The painting below gives the visitors something of a sense of Florence in that 1504 period. You get an impression for the relatively small size of the Florence while recognising its bustling metropolis-like environment to which Michelangelo, Leonardo and Raphael were drawn.

The first drawings we get to see are from Michelangelo. These are some of his earliest surviving drawings – from the early 1490s. They’ve been brought to this exhibition to tingle the spine but also to explore how Michelangelo developed as an artist.

✲✲✲

Study of a Man and Kneeling Man by Michelangelo Buonarroti

  

Pen and brown ink on paper.

✲✲✲

Nude study for the Battle of Cascina by Michelangelo Buonarroti

Then we’re bought forward to the period of around 1504 and we get to see some truly exquisite drawings by Michelangelo (such as the below male nude).

     

Pen and brown ink and chalk on paper.

Michelangelo then seems to converge artistically closer to the subject matter of The Taddei Tondo – which is the Virgin and Child with the infant St John the Baptist.

✲✲✲

Studies for a Holy Family by Michelangelo Buonarroti

✲✲✲

Study of Horsemen in Combat and Foot Soldiers by Leonardo da Vinci (1503)

We can see the process involved in creating this tondo play out in front of our eyes and this is one of the reasons why this exhibition is so powerful. (For example, the studies of the infant (St John the Baptist) by Michelangelo were partly inspired by Leonardo’s practice of producing a variety of quick sketches for inspiration and to develop ideas. These are incredibly detailed (and rare!!) sketches which show Michelangelo’s creative process.)

✲✲✲

It’s also extremely fascinating when we see how Raphael was very much influenced by The Taddei Tondo – even in its unfinished state. We can see the influence in many of Raphael sketches from the time. There is something really magical in looking over their shoulders, as it were, and turning to see the Tondo in situ (and being able to see the influence).

✲✲✲

Studies for a Virgin and Child in her arms by Raphael

 

Raphael’s exploration of the motif of the Virgin and the twisting Christ Child.

Eventually these pictures of the Virgin and child with the infant John the Baptist came to be shown in The Bridgewater Madonna and a similar theme in the Esterhazy Madonna (lent from Budapest).

The Esterhazy Madonna was unfinished.

The Bridgewater Madonna (wiki) with the twisted baby Christ.

✲✲✲

In 1504, there began a discussion about where to place Michelangelo’s David statue within Florence. One of the most thrilling moments was seeing this wonderful sketch of David by Raphael. It’s so beautiful. If I could take any sketch home, it would be that one!! We also get to see Raphael’s Leda and the Swan in the manner of Leonardo da Vinci too. This Florentine synergy is what makes this show so fascinating.

✲✲✲

Study of “Leda and the Swan” by Raphael

✲✲✲

Study of “David” by Raphael

✲✲✲

Gallery 2 - “Leonardo and The Burlington House Cartoon”

The second room focuses on the Burlington House cartoon by Leonardo da Vinci. This is a treasure of the National Gallery. I have already blogged about this Da Vinci cartoon on my blog before.

The purpose of the cartoon has puzzled scholars for generations but this exhibition proposes for the first time that Leonardo made the cartoon as a proposal for an order piece of a church in Florence:

Leonardo made it as a proposal for an altarpiece for the newly built Sala del Gran Consiglio in the Palazzo della Signoria, originally commissioned from Filippino Lippi (1457-1504). The altarpiece’s commission had not been reassigned following Filippino’s death in 1504. Having been summoned to Milan in 1506, Leonardo may have presented the Burlington House Cartoon to the wondering gaze of the curious public upon his return to Florence in 1507. He eventually settled in Milan more permanently in 1508, after which the Signoria turned to Fra Bartolommeo (1472-1517). The latter began work on the panel but, following the return from exile of the Medici, formerly the most powerful family in Florence, never finished it; by 1513, he had completed only the monochrome underpainting.

✲✲✲

Gallery 3 - “The Battles of Michelangelo and Leonardo”

Room 3 focuses on two murals that were proposed but never produced for the Hall at the Piazza della Signoria in Florence.

These two murals – one by Leonardo and one by Michelangelo – were celebrating great Florentine victories. Leonardo was going to be producing a mural depicting Florentine victory over the Milanes at the Battle of Anghiari, whereas Michelangelo was tasked with portraying the Florentine victory over the Pisans at the Battle of Cascina.

This was a time of glowing Florentine Pride (exemplified by the production of Michelangelo’s David).

In the UK, we are very lucky to have one of the best collections of Renaissance drawings in the world (the British museum, the Royal collection, the Ashmolean etc.) and the room is full of a vast body of preparatory works for the murals.

✲✲✲

The Battle of Anghiari after Leonardo da Vinci, retouched by Peter Paul Rubens

Leonardo focused on portraying four specific military captains locked in a bloody & horrific battle. Two captains of the Milaneses, and two of the papal and Florentine armies.

(Leonardo’s composition was faithfully recorded by an unknown Italian artist.)

✲✲✲

The Battle of Cascina by Bastiano da Sangallo, after Michelangelo

A very different composition of Michelangelo (which was faithfully recorded by another artist). No violence and no horror of war, but the instant of the horn blaring an impending attack. Soldiers bathing in the river Arno.

✲✲✲

It’s fascinating to see how both artists went about portraying the battle.

We see Leonardo’s trademark anatomical studies and Michelangelo’s obsession with the male nude (reaches its peak in the Sistine Chapel’s ceiling).

What makes these so exciting, for me, is that you’re almost sitting on the shoulders of these great masters as they work out ideas. Although Michelangelo, Leonardo and Raphael were geniuses, they had to work very hard and experiment and practice their ideas and inspirations.

✲✲✲

Studies from Michelangelo’s cartoon for “The Battle of Cascina”

  

Michelangelo’s male nude, and twisting bodies and shock and surprise.

✲✲✲

Studies of a head of a Soldier by Michelangelo

This is apparently one of the few times Michelangelo explored the human face to convey expression.

✲✲✲

Study of a rearing horse by Leonardo da Vinci

✲✲✲

Study of the Lower Half of a Nude Man by Leonardo da Vinci

That sketch of a man’s leg by Leonardo is phenomenal.

✲✲✲

Study of a rearing horse, and heads of horses by Leonardo da Vinci

The rearing horse is Leonardo’s motif.

That horse’s head is rigorously studied.

✲✲✲

Study of an Angel of the Annunciation by Leonardo da Vinci

Wow!

Leonardo’s artistic doodlings!

I absolutely love this - almost a canvass of his brain.